Comments on: MySQL insert performance with iiBench Python client http://tokutek.com/2009/03/mysql-insert-performance-with-iibench-python-client/ Database Performance Sat, 28 Aug 2010 12:16:29 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0 By: Arjen Lentz http://tokutek.com/2009/03/mysql-insert-performance-with-iibench-python-client/comment-page-1/#comment-3 Arjen Lentz Thu, 19 Mar 2009 02:21:17 +0000 http://blogs.tokutek.com/tokuview/mysql_insert_performance_with_iibench_python_client/#When:14:56:00Z#comment-3 Bigger multi-row inserts. Bigger multi-row inserts.

]]> By: Mark Callaghan http://tokutek.com/2009/03/mysql-insert-performance-with-iibench-python-client/comment-page-1/#comment-2 Mark Callaghan Wed, 18 Mar 2009 16:52:22 +0000 http://blogs.tokutek.com/tokuview/mysql_insert_performance_with_iibench_python_client/#When:14:56:00Z#comment-2 This is great. I wondered about Python overhead, but I didn't worry enough to spend time on it and improve it as you have. I like the second version (no changes to MySQLdb). I need to change the code to remove the dependency on the multiprocessing package so that people with Python versions less than 2.6 can run this. And the impact of the Python overhead is much greater for Tokutek than other storage engines, given that performance doesn't degrade much as the table gets large. This is great. I wondered about Python overhead, but I didn’t worry enough to spend time on it and improve it as you have. I like the second version (no changes to MySQLdb). I need to change the code to remove the dependency on the multiprocessing package so that people with Python versions less than 2.6 can run this.

And the impact of the Python overhead is much greater for Tokutek than other storage engines, given that performance doesn’t degrade much as the table gets large.

]]>